<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: blog as moneymaker? darn right</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.meshconference.com/blog/2006/04/19/blog-as-moneymaker-darn-right/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.meshconference.com/blog/2006/04/19/blog-as-moneymaker-darn-right/</link>
	<description>connect &#124; share &#124; inspire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 18:55:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph</title>
		<link>http://www.meshconference.com/blog/2006/04/19/blog-as-moneymaker-darn-right/comment-page-1/#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mesh.dreamhosters.com/blog/2006/04/19/blog-as-moneymaker-darn-right/#comment-115</guid>
		<description>Visibility is key isn&#039;t it?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Or are we witnessing a paradigm shift in PR which demands from campaigning and promotional strategies the attachment of meaning to that visibility?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Whether its in the form of a well orchestrated PR campaign or a  well-thought out discussion appearing on a blog, viewers will continue to judge those opinions  against the sidebar of business promotion by way of &quot;paid-blogging&quot; or some form of corporate sponsorship. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Anyway you look at it, consumers are demanding information and knowledge to inform their decisions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The web has created a monster task for PR efforts, as consumers have been forced a level of saviness that could only be made possible by the contstant need for business to promote and cross-promote itself -- I happen to think, towards the propect that no consumer can ever really be satisfied.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Its no coincidence that the same tactics used in boardrooms across the country to lop a competitors legs with intel and dirt to steer away interest, are now the same tactics empowering the consumer age.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I think what it comes down to is the relevance of the web-based discussion to any business, whether that dicussion derives from a blog, message board or gripe site.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A couple of quick thoughts to elaborate further on this point.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The first being that it doesn&#039;t add enough value to any type of brand or reputation monitoring effort when there is one comment or opinion shared without any discussion surrounding it.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Whether that dicussion be in the form of agreement or rebuttal, there is a value to seeing different views on a topic which happens to also have an impact on the way a business conducts itself, and delivers its products, services or message.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The second is that perception is reality, and I&#039;m of the belief that opinions have only as much weight in consumers minds if they are percieved as genuine &quot;consumer influence&quot; instead of &quot;wage persuasion.&quot;  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What I&#039;m speaking about here is that opinion with ties or affiliations to a business that is coincidentally the thing you happen to be defending or promoting on a blog or forum will have less impact on the viewer than a well thought out and independently formed opinion.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Finally, and as much as I hate to say it, I also believe that the perception value towards carefully crafted blogging campaigs which also happen to be connected to PR efforts will eventually carry the same negative overtone as a splog.  Some more thought and refinement on PR blogging is needed to ensure this doesn&#039;t happen.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Visibility is key isn&#039;t it?</p>
<p>Or are we witnessing a paradigm shift in PR which demands from campaigning and promotional strategies the attachment of meaning to that visibility?</p>
<p>Whether its in the form of a well orchestrated PR campaign or a  well-thought out discussion appearing on a blog, viewers will continue to judge those opinions  against the sidebar of business promotion by way of &quot;paid-blogging&quot; or some form of corporate sponsorship. </p>
<p>Anyway you look at it, consumers are demanding information and knowledge to inform their decisions.</p>
<p>The web has created a monster task for PR efforts, as consumers have been forced a level of saviness that could only be made possible by the contstant need for business to promote and cross-promote itself &#8212; I happen to think, towards the propect that no consumer can ever really be satisfied.  </p>
<p>Its no coincidence that the same tactics used in boardrooms across the country to lop a competitors legs with intel and dirt to steer away interest, are now the same tactics empowering the consumer age.</p>
<p>I think what it comes down to is the relevance of the web-based discussion to any business, whether that dicussion derives from a blog, message board or gripe site.  </p>
<p>A couple of quick thoughts to elaborate further on this point.</p>
<p>The first being that it doesn&#039;t add enough value to any type of brand or reputation monitoring effort when there is one comment or opinion shared without any discussion surrounding it.  </p>
<p>Whether that dicussion be in the form of agreement or rebuttal, there is a value to seeing different views on a topic which happens to also have an impact on the way a business conducts itself, and delivers its products, services or message.</p>
<p>The second is that perception is reality, and I&#039;m of the belief that opinions have only as much weight in consumers minds if they are percieved as genuine &quot;consumer influence&quot; instead of &quot;wage persuasion.&quot;  </p>
<p>What I&#039;m speaking about here is that opinion with ties or affiliations to a business that is coincidentally the thing you happen to be defending or promoting on a blog or forum will have less impact on the viewer than a well thought out and independently formed opinion.</p>
<p>Finally, and as much as I hate to say it, I also believe that the perception value towards carefully crafted blogging campaigs which also happen to be connected to PR efforts will eventually carry the same negative overtone as a splog.  Some more thought and refinement on PR blogging is needed to ensure this doesn&#039;t happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

